...

Welcome to

Health Decision Key!

Your trusted resource for evidence-based information on medications and medical procedures. Our mission is to empower patients, healthcare professionals, and researchers by synthesizing rigorous scientific studies into clear, unbiased summaries. Whether you’re exploring treatment options, comparing medications, or seeking insights into the latest research, Health Decision Key provides reliable information to inform your decisions. Dive into our comprehensive reviews, stay up-to-date with the latest findings, and make informed choices based on our highest standard of evidence.

...
“Should I consider taking prescribed to manage my condition?”
“What does the research say about generic drug?”
“Should the new drug blurring be on our standard formulary?”
“How does drug firstdrug compare to drug second for treating thisdisease?”

The information you need to make the best decisions is often hidden behind complex data and technical jargon. Even if you have the time to sift through it all, you may not have the expertise to interpret it accurately. Our critical appraisal experts remove ambiguity and misleading data, leaving you with clear options.

What is Critical Appraisal?

Critical appraisal is a systematic method for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of scientific studies to determine their reliability and relevance. This process assesses whether the findings are trustworthy and applicable to specific clinical or health policy situations. The goal is not only to judge the quality of the study but also to gauge how its results can impact patient care or health outcomes. Critical Appraisal is not medical advice. Its aim is to remove ambiguity and misleading data, leaving you with clear options.

Here are key aspects typically assessed during the critical appraisal of medical studies:

Validity: Checks if the study results are accurate and unbiased. Examples of ways this is determined include the study design, completeness of randomization, and effectiveness of blinding, which are ways a study’s results can become inherently biased.

Reliability: Evaluates whether the methods and findings are consistent and can be replicated. This may be done by evaluating raw data, and also by evaluating multiple studies and outcomes.

Applicability: Considers whether the results are relevant and meaningful. Sometimes a study’s participants are selected or undergo pre-treatment evaluation that can impact the results.

Results: Analyzes the significance of the results. This is where specific statistical analysis expertise is required, but also common-sense ideas about what matters to an individual as a meaningful outcome.

Ethics: Ensures the study complies with ethical standards. The funding source of a study and payment of the researchers does not indicate inherent bias.

What does our critical appraisal include?

Summary of Assessment and Overall Grade of Evidence from Studies

Individual Study Analysis and Grade(s)

References

Explanation of Critical Appraisal and Meanings

Make better decisions

Our experts will remove ambiguity and misleading data, leaving you with clear options

"A" Grade

An "A" grade study is like a top-tier, well-built car. You can trust it to perform exceptionally well on the road, just as you can trust its findings to guide medical decisions.

"B" Grade"

A "B" grade study is akin to a decent, reliable car. It's not the absolute best, but it's still trustworthy enough to get you where you need to go. Similarly, its findings are still valuable for making medical decisions.

"U" Grade

However, a "U" grade study is like a broken-down, unreliable car that might not even start. Just as you wouldn't want to risk driving such a car, you can't rely on the findings of a "U" grade study to predict patient outcomes accurately.

Imagine...

If you want to cook something and you go to the Internet for a recipe. What would you do if you knew beforehand that 60 to 70% of the recipes were so poorly done that you couldn’t rely on the quality of the food.

Turns out that 60 to 70% of the articles published in the medical literature are of such poor quality that Physicians can’t rely on them to predict what will happen to their patients. What can doctors do to sort these issues out ? Turns out there is a way for doctors and patients to decide which articles are useful and which aren’t. This is called critical appraisal.

Here’s how critical appraisal works. A medical study is a valuated for six criteria that determine whether the study is it well done enough to be usable. Here are the six criteria.

  1. patients must be randomly assigned to either the treatment or the placebo or no treatment group
  2. neither patients nor doctors must know which patient is getting a treatment or a placebo. This is known as blinding.
  3. the way patients are assigned to the two groups must not allow tampering or manipulation of any kind. This is known as concealment of allocation.
  4. patients must be evaluated in the same group, to which they were randomized
  5. both groups must have the same risk factors at the start of the study
  6. both groups must be treated equally except for the treatment in question

If one or more of these criteria are not followed, then the study is less likely to predict the results of the medication or treatment for a given patient. When we evaluate medical studies using the six criteria, we give them a letter grade
A – High quality, can be useful for decision making
B – Not as good as A, but still good enough
U – unusable not well done enough to be an accurate predictor of patient outcomes

When we report results, we will use these three grades. If it is an A or B, you can be reasonably confident that the treatment or medication will perform as advertised. If we give the study a U rating, it means that the study is so poorly done that we are not certain that the proposed treatment/medication will provide the advertised benefit. In that case, you will need to discuss this with your physician and decide if you are comfortable going forward. Remember just because the evidence is a poor quality doesn’t mean that the treatment or medication won’t produce the benefit; it just means you don’t know for sure.

Imagine you're in the market for a new car. You head to a dealership, excited to find the perfect vehicle. But what if you were told that 60 to 70% of the cars on the lot were so poorly made that you couldn't trust their performance on the road?

Well, in the world of medicine, it turns out that 60 to 70% of the studies published in medical journals are like those unreliable cars. Doctors can't rely on them to make important decisions about their patients' health. So, what can doctors and patients do to navigate this issue? The answer lies in a process called "critical appraisal."

When we use critical appraisal to evaluate medical studies, it's a bit like inspecting cars before buying. Here's how it works:

  1. patients must be randomly assigned to either the treatment or the placebo or no treatment group
  2. neither patients nor doctors must know which patient is getting a treatment or a placebo. This is known as blinding.
  3. the way patients are assigned to the two groups must not allow tampering or manipulation of any kind. This is known as concealment of allocation.
  4. patients must be evaluated in the same group, to which they were randomized
  5. both groups must have the same risk factors at the start of the study
  6. both groups must be treated equally except for the treatment in question

If one or more of these criteria are not followed, then the study is less likely to predict the results of the medication or treatment for a given patient. When we evaluate medical studies using the six criteria, we give them a letter grade
A – High quality, can be useful for decision making
B – Not as good as A, but still good enough
U – unusable not well done enough to be an accurate predictor of patient outcomes

When we report results, we will use these three grades. If it is an A or B, you can be reasonably confident that the treatment or medication will perform as advertised. If we give the study a U rating, it means that the study is so poorly done that we are not certain that the proposed treatment/medication will provide the advertised benefit. In that case, you will need to discuss this with your physician and decide if you are comfortable going forward. Remember just because the evidence is a poor quality doesn’t mean that the treatment or medication won’t produce the benefit; it just means you don’t know for sure.

...